Friday, December 17, 2010

Comment on the Zadroga Bill

While I watched The Daily Show, tonight, an absurdity struck me. It was not, however, Jon Stewart’s usual juxtaposition of distinctly crude humor—to which I am profoundly indifferent, as a genre—with incisive political satire. No, tonight’s small slice of bizarre, cosmic recognition involved recall of a news program I had watched earlier, on MSNBC, The Ed Show with Ed Schultz, a stocky, folksy Midwestern pundit and avowed proponent of the middle class. Stewart, an entertainer, a self-proclaimed “funny-man,” had a sit down panel to discuss the failed Zadroga Bill with four ill, possibly terminally ill, first responders to the terrorists attacks of September 11th, 2001. Mr. Schultz entertained a tall, bird-like woman with dark hair, one of his most frequent guests, to harp on whether or not Bristol Palin’s performance on Dancing With the Stars had been tainted by Tea Party Conspiracy. I do not remember which of Mr. Schultz’s cavalcade of irritating female comics this was. If it was Lizz Winstead, one of the co-creators of Jon Stewart’s Daily Show, then I suppose the situation’s basic surreality was heightened, some, but when saturation in the ludicrous becomes opaque enough to obscure the reality of what one experiences then a little more doesn’t matter, one way or the other.

Stewart interviewed four men, each of whom dug through the rubble after al-Qaeda’s attack on America. Kenny Speck, a veteran of the Fire Department of New York, struggles with heart and lung problems. Bruce Fowlman, of the New York Police Department, is afflicted by heart, lung and brain problems, and is unable to get the health care he needs and deserves. Ken George, of the Department of Transportation, has debilitating heart and back conditions and John Devlin, an operating engineer, is dying of stage four throat cancer. Another of their friends, mentioned by Mr. Speck, is dying of facial cancer, a condition so horrific that it has cause the very nose to rot off of his face. These men, and so many more like them, men who sacrificed their health and lives to protect others, are the men who are hurt by the political wrangling over tax cuts which has enmeshed the Zadroga Bill, named for another civil servant who has already died of illnesses connected to September 11th.

Our culture, like these men, has been wounded unto the point of death. We are unable, anymore, to distinguish between fantasy and reality, between what is really important and what is nothing more than smoke and mirrors used to cloud our collective judgment, making us unable to make the moral choices which develop our finely tuned humanity. Our culture has become, as T.S. Eliot put it so eloquently in The Waste Land, “a heap of broken images.” There seem to be very few hermeneutic methods available for discerning what is essential and what is worthless, and even less impetus towards developing those methods. We divide ourselves into tribes of howling barbarians based on allegiances to celebrities—Jay Leno or Conan O’Brien, the New York Giants or the Green Bay Packers, Taylor Swift or Kanye West, Fox News or MSNBC, Sarah Palin or Kate Goesselin—and long for nothing more than ascent, god-like, into the ranks of celebrity ourselves where we might become, even if for just one instant of humiliation in thin tabloid pages, a scintillating being like the Lady Gaga we see, parading down a runway wrapped in bloody meat. Empathy and authenticity are devalued in place of simple visibility and rank notoriety. Worth is determined by your hit counter and your twitter list.

This mood has invaded our political process to an alarming degree. Politicians do not govern, but simply exist in a state of constant campaign theatre. Like sharks, they must continuously swim to survive. Each action is a piece of stage magic, calculated to provoke a response. The Zadroga Bill was caught up in this sort of political maneuvering, and these heroic, dying civil servants have been sacrificed on the altar of political celebrity. I watched Mitch McConnell, supposedly a public servant himself, moan tearfully about a retiring fellow Senator, his thoughts nowhere close to those whom he and his ilk proclaim as “American heroes.” Those on the other side, who promised to close Guantanamo Bay and other places like it, are no more worthwhile when it comes to human rights, and hundreds of men—many of them nothing more than frightened goat-herders guilty of nothing more than angering the wrong neighbor—languish in black sites.

I do not wish to appear partisan in these criticisms. Both the Democratic and Republican parties are, by and large, owned by the same corporations. Although one party appears to have a deeper commitment to empathy and the all important social justice it engenders, this commitment is a surface level phenomenon only. The Democrats, for whom I am ashamed to have voted in 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2010, are a peculiar species of gutless worm man, slithering from inoffensive position to inoffensive position, a slave to the political theatre provided each and every identity and interest group imaginable. The Republicans are nothing more than hypocritical hobgoblins and worthy of no more comment than that, save that they gleefully played with the political theatre provided by the terror attacks of September 11th when it was useful to them, and have proven unwilling to pay for the privilege.

I would presume to finish this comment by saying, to all, “good night, and good luck,” in an echo of Edward R. Murrow, but America deserves neither restful sleep nor providence, although I fervently hope we are provided with both. We have earned, through our action and inaction, societal damnation and, in all likelihood, are preparing to reap what we have sewn.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Basic updates 1

Been a busy week, which has kept me from writing here much... or at all. On the other hand, I have written about twenty pages for my first classes as a graduate student, and am waiting for the grades on the first of those essays that I have turned in. Hopefully they won't turn out too badly; I did work pretty hard on them, after all. Some news and notes, though, just in general:

1: I love writing for my hermeneutics and New Testament historiography class. The work is fascinating and I absolutely love learning more about Jewish culture and religion.

2: I am excited for TNA picking up two new women, Kat Waters and Christina Von Eerie. Hopefully this means we'll see these two ladies and my favorite wrestler, Daffney, in a program , and that TNA has realized that dark, pale and tattooed is just as beautiful as tall, tanned and blond.

3: I am pissed off all over the place about Serena Deeb getting released form WWE. She seemed like a nice lady and is a greally great wrestler, and has seemingly been released for basically NOTHING. It just makes me wonder who she refused to sleep with, especially since Batista isn't there anymore. They used to treat the whole Divas division like his personal brothel.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

WWE NXT 2: Go Kaval!

So, Kaval got a chance to show off his freestyle rap skill tonight. He doesn't have quite the "flow" that Lord William Regal has (who does?) but he managed to rip everyone else on the NXT roster to shreds and to subtly plug TNA, the company which gave him his first big break back in 2002/2003. A little bit later, in a match against Husky Harris, Kaval amazed again with some of the stiffest kicks that I've ever seen in a wrestling match and a really, really brutal looking Warrior's Way off the top rope, and when Layla closes her eyes she hears his voice (!). I was disappointed to see the old school brute Husky cast aside in favor of Miz Jr., but it's good to see Kaval getting the recognition he deserves.

In other news, given Linda McMahon's recent remarks on Lance Cade I will not be purchasing anymore WWE pay per views or financially supporting them in any ways. I will give my support to Ring of Honor and TNA, companies which at least sort of treat their workers like human beings.

Monday, August 16, 2010

WWE Summerslam

Heck of a Pay per view tonight! I'm normally not a huge fan of WWE, especially since the release of Mickie James and the necktie debacle which lead to the (temporary) release of Bryan Danielson, but the show as a whole was pretty good tonight. Melina looked like an absolute dream of an Aztec sun goddess, and her absolutely wonderful shriek (I adore lady wrestlers that scream) echoed throughout the arena. I was afraid that her knee had buckled during the match, and she may end up needing to work a slower, more methodical style, but she in general looked great and dominated Alicia Fox totally.

The night's big story, however, was the American Dragon's return. Here is your proof, naysayers, that a small man without an obvious gimmick (like a luchador) can 1) get pops in a big arena and 2) absolutely, totally and completely dominate the ring with his pure intensity. Okay, I'll admit it... I kind of giggled when Danielson stomped to the ring looking like this very, very angry Hobbit, but then he got in there and absolutely kicked the crap out of Darren Young and tangled him up in a seriously vicious looking submission hold. The whole match looked good (even grandpa Marvin Marsh, aka Bret Hart) but the highlights were Danielson's total mastery of the ring and Skip's total domination of Morrison and Truth. I may write more later when I am not so 'wow!' but, well, this is just proof that WWE can still surprise me and make me excited, and I'm glad about that.

Sunday, August 15, 2010

Joshi 11: TNA Xplosion, Daffney vs. Hamada

This match makes me, along with many other fans of women's wrestling, wonder why TNA Xplosion is a B-show, relegated to the United Kingdom and the internet and why, oh why, we only ever get matches involving the Beautiful People and Angelina Love on TNA Impact on Thursday nights. A short list of things I noted about the match:

1. They need to turn Taylor Wilde heel, like, yesterday. The girl cannot cut a face promo to save her life, and continually comes off as an unlikable little drip anytime she gets near a microphone and opens her mouth. From mocking Daffney a few weeks ago before their match, to her little 'talk to the hand' moments when discussing her feud with Sarita tonight, this girl was made to be a jerk. Funny thing is, too, that she doesn't really come off like that at all, in other venues like her twitter, but she seems like such a naturally snarky little machine on camera that I can't believe they don't run with that a little bit.

2. Daffney is hilarious. Her character work is almost perfect... the slurry voice, the sort of vague expression and the sense of 'wow, I really am a total psychopath... and I'm really happy with it!' make her totally engaging. I've been a fan of hers for years, since WCW, and don't even mind when I don't get a tweet back cause she gets so many and has had so many knocks on the head, and just don't understand why TNA won't push this girl to the moon as a manager, mouthpiece, wrestler... something. Her new teeny top hat and dress combo was nice, too... the blue, black, her very pale skin and her eye make-up mesh together and give her a sort of ethereal, unearthly look.

3. The match itself was good. Hamada looks as stiff as heck--how can somebody that adorable be that vicious?!?!--and Daffney sells like a champion. I really don't get why some reviewers said this was a terrible match, and am convinced that they are just somewhat prejudiced against women's wrestling or, perhaps, just don't watch the matches and grumble about them anyway.

4. Taz sounded drunk, like he usually does. He does a good job of selling the girls like they're made out of gold, but some of his lines are real groaners (and/or oinkers... I mean, jeez, dude). Although I will always love him for giving us the 'Zombie Hot' moniker, he often just sounds dumb. Don West wasn't much better, though, and either is miles better than most of what we get in WWE, so I won't complain too much.

5. Post match brawl was a little weak, due to time constraints, but I'd love it if this set up a little feud.

Friday, August 13, 2010

American Joshi 11: Why Daffney is more awesome than awesome.

1. She's one of the two best screamers in wrestling, and is the original Scream Queen. MsChif has a rawer, throatier shriek, but Daffney can go higher and has better vocal control.

2. Her finishers, the Lobotomy and the Daff-knees, look legitimately painful but she never botches them and makes me think she's killed some poor girl.

3. She may fall down, go boom and hit her head, but in a couple of week's Daff always struts back to the ring and shrieks her little lungs out.

4. I'm not normally into girls with tattoos--the blue tends to look dingy--but Daff's green, red and yellow ink is incredibly vibrant against that lovely, porcelain pale skin.

5. One of her newest tattoos, in fact, is a little Ganesha.

6. She's a Southern home girl, from Atlanta, GA (and Cybil,TX), got her start in WCW and currently works in TNA, both of them Southern promotions.

7. She was something interesting to watch in WCW in 1999 and 2000.

8. She seems like a sweet, genuine, funny, goofy chick and has a good creative mind for wrestling character development.

9. She wears tiny top hats.

10. She took the drop onto the tacks and had to get twenty tacks dug out of her head.

11. She can have convincing chemistry with anyone, including the delightfully large-headed blond Canadian midget Taylor Wilde and a hibachi grill.

12. "I'm a boogeeeeeeeeer!"

13. She's a better Sarah Palin than Sarah Palin.

14. Pale, quirky brunettes have got it going on.

15. She has the most wonderful, underrated promos in wrestling.

16. She's zombie hot and/or a pale, sadistic tomato what screams a lot.

17. She makes a creepy, pink shark mask kinda cute.

18. "Santa's gonna knock you out! Santa's gonna knock you out! Santa's gonna knock you out! Santa's gonna knock you out! Huh!"

Thursday, August 12, 2010

School Stuff 2: Began reading today

Today I started reading on the history of the early church and on the historiography of the New Testament, as part of my first semester as a seminarian. I am very excited about both of these subjects and am already learning a lot. The most interesting aspect I have learned from the church history book is about the three different strands of early Christianity... a heavily Jewish sect centered itself in Jerusalem (which followed circumcision of the flesh), a strand which blended Jewish prophecy/law and Greek moral philosophy arose under Paul in Antioch in Syria (which followed circumcision of the spirit) and a third, more mystical strand arose in Ephesus, dedicated to the beautiful, esoteric Johannine writings (and which, like the Antiochan school, followed the circumcision of the spirit). This area, in Ephesus, was also where it is believed that Mary (mother of Jesus) died, and is where the first Marian cults arose and gained prominent in AD 600 or so. The Council of Ephesus, held in this area, is where it was promulgated that Mary was the 'Mother of God,' a decision which both promoted the divinity of Jesus and their own particular patron. Ephesus was also an area associated with Artemis, a pagan goddess associated with virginity and childbirth, and this could help to explain why a Marian emphasis arose in this area.

I also did a great deal of reading, tonight, on how the New Tesament developed as a canon over the years. Most interesting, probably, were the rigidly defined, medieval "levels of interpretation." One was supposed to read the book first literally, then tropologically, then morally and then analogically. In direct opposition to this was the Renaissance interpretation, which came from the Northern European Christian humanists like Erasmus, which held that the the other interpretations would flow out of the literal interpretation rather than existing as discrete entities. This reading also revealed a long tradition of critical theological reading which belies the notional that critical readings of the New Testament are a recent phenomenon. I look forward to reading more tomorrow!